The Vitruvian Triad as a base for an introduction to the Theory of Architecture «A Pedagogical Approach»

Abstract

There exists a problematic in the study and teaching of the subject of Theory of Architecture, for there is no consensus amongst academics and professionals about its essence and nature. Some scholars adopt a philosophy-based approach (Schulz), others adopt a formal approach (Ching), while some stick to the historical base in introducing the subject.

Therefore, when I was asked to teach a course titled (introduction or entrance) to the Theory of architecture, in light of this problematic, I took the safe root by basing my approach on the Vitruvian Triad of defining architecture, upon which there is little debate as to its validity among academics, and building upon it my teaching methodology and argument later. My proposal commences with introducing a wider triad-frame to assimilate the Vitruvian Triad: (architecture-architect-architectural product). This Triad would be later extended to project and relate to three other triangles (pyramids). Sequentiallyو architecture would be tied to the Vitruvian Triad; Architect with Bloom’s Taxonomy for critical thinking; and the Architectural Product to be tied to Maslow’s hierarchy of human needs. This paper will discuss the relations and interrelations between the three triangle pyramids and establishes the pedagogical merit of using the as a base for teaching and studying Architecture Theory on the introductory level.