The criminal confrontation of audio recordings between the sanctity of private life and the necessities of proof (A comparative study)

Authors

  • Majd Abdul Hai Saker Faculty of Law , Damascus University.
  • Tamim Mikael Faculty of Law , Damascus University.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71219/

Keywords:

Audio Recording , Victim, Private Life, Proof

Abstract

The technological revolution led to the emergence of modern devices and technologies that allow recording conversations and phone calls and keeping these recordings in a way that allows them to be re-listened, transmitted or published. These recordings raise many problems, including reconciling the fact that they constitute a violation of the sanctity of the private life of individuals on the one hand, and the fact that they may help in revealing the crime and the perpetrator, and the right to sanctity of the conversations and calls of the individual collides with the right of the victim - who may be affected by these conversations or calls - to prove On the one hand, the speaker who assaulted others through his conversations or calls wastes his right to privacy, and on the other hand, the right of the person against whom this assault occurred to evidence becomes more important, especially if these recordings are the only way he has to prove his claim.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Majd Abdul Hai Saker, Faculty of Law , Damascus University.

    PhD candidate, Department of Criminal Law, Faculty of Law, Damascus University

  • Tamim Mikael , Faculty of Law , Damascus University.

    Professor, Department of Criminal Law, Faculty of Law, Damascus University

Downloads

Published

2026-02-25

How to Cite

The criminal confrontation of audio recordings between the sanctity of private life and the necessities of proof (A comparative study). (2026). Damascus University Journal for Legal Sciences, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.71219/