The causality between classical physics and contemporary physics

Abstract

Since the beginning of thinking, humans have found themselves faced with phenomena that must be understood and interpreted. This thinking has evolved and progressed, with various methods and tools being used. Initially, the metaphysical method, based on contemplation, was used.

 As thought evolved, a different translation of reality was required, one that was more precise, deeper, and less speculative. Scientists then developed a new method that began with sensory observation and was linked to the empirical method. Human thought was now required to adhere to the limits of experience, as they saw in it a precision lacking in philosophical speculation. The metaphysical method, relying on intuition and speculation, often faltered

in providing this precision, as it was unable to account for some assumptions that the empirical and mathematical methods could. All these contradictions were raised in order to understand the universe and its phenomena, when it controls us and when we control it - when we discover it as it is and when we make it as we are. However, this distinction may overlap in classical physics when they find the way in the causal relationship.